Print Edition

Volume 89-4

Symposium: the future of intellectual property

• Univeristy of Detroit Mercy Law Review's Third Annual Live Symposium Event Program

Symposium articles

• The Future of Intellectual Property:  Rembembering the Past
• Intellectual Property: 'Bargain' or Not?

comment

• Who is Swimming in Your Gene Pool?  Harmonizing the International Pattern of Gene Patentability to Benefit Patient Care and the Biotechnology Industry

mCelroy lecture

• Child Sex Abuse in Institutional Settings: What is Next

volume 89-3

articles

• Why Arizona Senate Bill 1070 is Constitutional and not Preempted by Federal Law
• The Ethical Dilemma of Local Ordinances that Purport to Deport Illegal Aliens

noteS and commentS

• Neglecting Due Process Rights of Immigrants in the Southwest United States: A Critique of Operation Streamline
• Pocketing a Pretty Penny: Sexual Victimization, Human Rights, and Private Contractors in the U.S. Immigration Detention System

VOLUME 89-2

ARTICLE

• Trademark Infringement Rules in Google Keyword Advertising

NOTES and commentS

• Growing in the D: Revising Current Laws to Promote a Model of Sustainable City Agriculture
• Frustrating Commerce: The Negative Effect of Penrod on the Economy and the Automobile Industry
• Clearing the Regulatory Hurdles and Promoting Offshore Wind Development in Michigan
• Child Abuse is Color Blind: Why the Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights Provision of the Indian Child Welfare Act Should Be Reformed

VOLUME 89-1

ARTICLES

• Adverse Possession, Takings, and the State
• Title II and High School Athletics Age Limits: Individualized Assessments for Student-Athletes with Disabilities After PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin

 NOTES AND COMMENTS

• Eminent Domain: Detroit’s Struggle to Downsize
• Taking a Heavy Toll: The Constitutional Implications of Prohibiting Equitable Tolling in Cases of Actual Innocence
• Getting into the Hot Tub: How the United States Could Benefit from Australia’s Concept of “Hot Tubbing” Expert Witnesses
• Miranda Version 2.0: Upgrading American Criminal Procedure by Utilizing a Two-Fold Approach to Facilitating the Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations

VOLUME 88-4

Introductory address

• Justice for Clarence Thomas: An Intellectual History of Justice Thomas's Twenty Years on the Supreme Court

Keynote Address

• Reflections on Justice Thomas's Twenty Years on the Bench

symposium articles

• The Next Constitutional Revolution
• The Loudness of Justice Thomas
• Justice Thomas, Race, and the Constitution Through the Lens of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois
• Clarence Thomas's Originalist Understanding of the Interstate, Negative, and Indian Commerce Clauses
• Rights Behind Bars: The Distinctive Viewpoint of Justice Clarence Thomas
• The Most Faithful Originalist?: Justice Thomas, Justice Scalia, and the Future of Originalism

ARTICLE

• Limiting Judges: Placing Limits on Judges' Power in Hard-look Review

Volume 88-3

Articles

• The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens
• Ancient Laws, Yet Strangely Modern: Biblical Contract and Tort Jurisprudence
• PROCEDAMUS IN PACE Serving Justice: RLUIPA Resonates the Teachings of Dignitatis Humanae, and the Third Circuit’s “Substantial Burden” Test Provides a Thorough, Fair Inquiry into a Prisoner’s Religious Exercise
• After Review: An Open Letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell Suggesting that Limiting the League’s Disciplinary Power Under the Personal Conduct Policy May Be in the League’s Best Interests

 Notes and Comments

• Michigan’s Wine Shipping Restrictions: A Valid Use of Twenty-first Amendment Control or Sleight of Hand Legislation Discriminating Against the Free Market?
• Creating Property Rights out of Whole Cloth: Judicial Activists Beware, Section 560.221 of the Michigan Land Division Act is not a License to Create Otherwise Non-Existent Property Rights
• Steering Clear of the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine: Placing the Burden Where It Belongs
• Student Athletes and the Deprivation of Rights of Privacy and Publicity—Are Fantasy Sports Leagues Infringing Upon the Rights of College Athletes? If so, What Constitutes a Viable Solution?

Volume 88-2

Articles

• A Loss for Words: “Religion” in the First Amendment
• You Can’t Say That, or Maybe You Can: An Analysis of Michigan Prosecutor Closing Argument Law
• Protecting Statements in Catholic Tribunal Proceedings Under the Priest-Penitent Privilege: Cimijotti v. Paulsen Considered

Notes and Comments

• Considering the Totality of the Circumstances for Asylum Applicants: Why the Bars to Asylum are in Desperate Need of Reform
• The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Efforts of the Mentally Ill to Achieve Equal and Adequate Health Coverage
• United States Farm Bill—An Antiquated Policy?
• Considering the Totality of the Circumstances for Asylum Applicants: Why the Bars to Asylum are in Desperate Need of Reform